Optional Elements of a Discipline Plan

Some Options You May Find Useful


DEVELOPING A DISCIPLINE PLAN FOR YOU

Thomas H. Allen, Ph.D.

(c)1996. All rights reserved. Fair use by teachers and students is authorized. Commercial use is prohibited except by prior written permission by the author
If you are to teach successfully, you must have the circumstances that make it possible for you to teach and for your pupils to learn. Those circumstances do not happen by accident. You need to develop a plan to ensure that reasonable circumstances for teaching and learning do occur.

Each teacher, class, subject,and situation is different. No plan will fit every situation.

The purpose of this text (and the Classroom Management Workshop it was designed to supplement) is to help you develop a discipline plan for your class, to know how to diagnose problems, and to know how to change the plan to fit changed situations.

Prior to 1970 there were no systematic classroom control models. Schools of education gave random good advice...much of which was useful. In the early 1960's, our societies' conventions and the schools started to come unglued. Teachers had previously been able to maintain order by asserting their authority. Pupils generally were reasonably well behaved and rarely required much disciplinary attention from the teacher. The old methods began to fail.

Teachers typically do the best that they know how to do. Some have discipline problems. Many of the teachers currently in the schools have not received systematic help to this day. Unless their school has brought in a workshop presenter, it is unlikely that they have had systematic instruction in developing a discipline plan for their classes.

In the decade from 1969 to 1979, a number of models were developed to deal with the fact that teachers all over the country were complaining that they could no longer teach effectively because of classroom disruption and student inattention.

A number of researchers observed the teaching of many instructors. They noted what worked and what didn't work. They developed systematic ways to deal with the problems of class control. Several of these systematic models are given in brief form here.

The descriptions of the following models have been digested by Tom Allen and modified to fit his own experience, other sources and workshops with such presenters as Lee Canter and Fred Jones. The models are summarized from Building Classroom Discipline: From Models to Practice, by C.M. Charles, Longman:New York, 1985. Charles has summarized seven systematic models of classroom management. Each of these has elements that you may find appropriate now or in the future. The models are based on extensive observation of pupil and teacher behavior and on research into various psychological aspects of human nature and behavior. They incorporate what is deemed to work in the hands of successful teachers.

The plan of this class is to work through the available options and develop a plan that will make it possible for you to teach and the pupils to learn...and for you to feel comfortable with what you do to make it possible.

Annual polls of beliefs about the schools consistently rate the lack of discipline at the top of the list of problems. Teachers and the general public agree on this. Even pupils agree that the lack of classroom discipline is the main problem. One poll found that 9 out of 10 teachers complained that student misbehavior interfered with their teaching.

Although fear of physical attack is common, serious injury of teachers is very rare. Verbal encounters with hostile students are more common. Violence among pupils and vandalism are common. But what is disrupting classes is relatively innocuous. Fred Jones researched the problem and found that about 99% of the typically encountered discipline problems are made up of such behaviors as pupils talking without permission, daydreaming, wandering around the room, or otherwise not doing what they have been asked to do.

If Jones is correct that nearly all of what bugs teachers is no more significant than goofing off, why all the concern? This low level misbehavior interferes with teaching and learning. It is a heavy contributor to stress and "burn-out." The need to deal constantly with noisy, disorderly, and discourteous behavior...and the occasionally serious confrontation with defiant behavior...wears teachers down. It is to deal with these routine distractions and to reduce the likelihood for confrontations that systematic classroom control models have been developed.

Although significant elements of various models have been presented here, the rationales and examples have been generally omitted due to space limitations. The selections were made to give an idea of the range of options open to the teacher...if you want to know more about one or more of the models, consult Building Classroom Discipline: From Models to Practice, by C.M. Charles, Longman:New York, several editions, or look up works by the authors of the individual models. When funding permits, the TPSS Program offers TPSS 701 Assertive Discipline and TPSS 701 Classroom management Techniques. These workshops, taught by local public school educators who have been trained by Lee Canter or Fred Jones, are highly recommended.

Underlying all discipline problems and efforts to cope with misbehavior are four basic realities of human nature: We tend to resist doing what others try to make us do; we like to denigrate and "question authority"; every person is different in interests, abilities and learning styles as well as different needs, wants and values; and, as children grow older, they need to be weaned psychologically in order to develop their potential. The ultimate goal should be to develop self-discipline in pupils and to move away from external, authority-imposed control; in the meanwhile, a systematic control system makes it possible for teachers to teach and pupils to learn. This teacher-imposed plan should provide for a transition to self-control and should wither away as it is no longer needed.

Return to top of this page


  • KEY IDEAS OF SEVEN MODELS OF DISCIPLINE.

    The Kounin Model:

    Withitness, Alerting, and Group Management.

    • The ripple effect: when you correct one pupil's behavior, it tends to change the behavior of others.
    • The teacher needs to be with it to know what is going on everywhere in the room at all times.
    • Smooth transitions between activities and maintaining momentum are key to effective group management.
    • Optimal learning takes place when teachers keep pupils alert and held accountable for learning.
    • Boredom [satiation] can be avoided by providing variety to lessons, the classroom environment and by pupil awareness of progress.

    The Neo-Skinnerian Model:

    Shaping Desired Behavior. B.F. Skinner is the father of the behavioral school of psychology. A recently popular outgrowth of Skinnerian behaviorism is Behavior Modification. For a useful presentation, see the section on the Behavioral Systems Family in Joyce and Weil, Models of Teaching, particularly the introduction to the section and chapters on "Learning Self-Control" and "Assertive Training."

    • Behavior is conditioned by its consequences. Behavior is strengthened if followed immediately by reinforcement. Behavior is weakened if it is not reinforced. ["Extinction."] Behavior is also weakened if it is followed by punishment.
    • In the beginning stages of learning, reinforcement provided every time the behavior occurs produces the best results.
    • Behavior can be maintained by irregular reinforcement. Reinforcers include verbal approval, smiles, "thumbs up," high grades, free reading time, goodies, prizes and awards.

    The Ginott Model:

    Addressing the Situation with Sane Messages.
    • Discipline is little-by-little, step-by-step. The teacher's self-discipline is key. Model the behavior you want in students.
    • Use sane messages when correcting misbehavior. Address what the student is doing, don't attack the student's character [personal traits]. Labeling disables.
    • Use communication that is congruentwith student's own feelings about the situation and themselves.
    • Invite cooperation rather than demanding it.
    • Teachers should express their feelings--anger--but in sane ways. "What you are doing makes me very angry. I need you to ...."
    • Sarcasm is hazardous.
    • Praise can be dangerous; praise the act, not the student and in a situation that will not turn peers against the pupil.
    • Apologies are meaningless unless it is clear that the person intends to improve.
    • Teachers are at their best when they help pupils developtheir self-esteem and to trust their own experience.

    The Glasser Model:

    Good Behavior Comes from Good Choices. Glasser's recent work focuses on the class meeting as a means of developing class-wide discipline. See the chapter on The Classroom Meeting in Joyce and Weil, Models of Teaching. [For those who have their classes under control and would like to try to go beyond teacher-imposed discipline, William Glasser's approach is worth serious consideration.

    • Students are rational beings capable of controlling their own behavior.
    • Help pupils learn to make good choices, since good choices produce good behavior.
    • Do not accept excuses for bad behavior. Ask, "What choices did you have? Why did you make that choice? Did you like the result? What have you learned?"
    • Reasonable consequences should always follow good or bad student behavior.
      • [Usually developed in classroom meetings,] class rules are essential to a good learning climate, they must be enforced.
      • Classroom meetings are a good way to develop and maintain class behavior. [The group diagnoses the problem and seeks solutions.]

    The Dreikurs Model:

    Confronting Mistaken Goals.
    • Discipline is not punishment. It means self-control.
    • The teacher's role is helping pupils to impose limits on themselves.
    • Teachers can model democratic behavior by providing guidance and leadership and involving pupils in setting rules and consequences.
    • All students want to belong. Their behavior is directed to belonging.
    • Misbehavior is the result of their mistaken belief that it will gain them peer recognition. [It is usually a mistake to assume that misbehavior is an attack directed at the teacher.]
    • Misbehavior is directed at mistaken goals: attention-getting, power-seeking, revenge, and displaying inadequacy. The trick is to identify the goal and act in ways that do not reinforce mistaken goals.
    • Teachers should encourage students' efforts, but avoid praising their work [?] or character. [Others disagree.]
    • Support the idea that negative consequences follow inappropriate behavior by your actions.


    The Canter Model: Assertively Taking Charge and The Fred Jones Model: Body Language, Incentive Systems, and Providing Efficient Help.

    The next two sections spell out the Canter and Jones models in some detail. These are the two systems most in use in public schools. I have moved them to a different file [press here] in order to shorten this page.

    Lists of Rules, Limit-Setting Acts, Consequences, etc.

    In preparing a discipline plan, consider what your objectives are and what needs to happen for those objectives to come about. Avoid jumping directly to a solution. If you say, "I have this tool [for example, detention], that ought to work." You have locked into a single option. To a person with a new hammer, everything looks like a nail.

    It is more productive to ask yourself, "I need to get John to stop talking and get to work. What options do I have?"

    My workshop participants have brainstormed a number of options for each of the elements of a discipline plan: rules, positive and negative reinforcers, limit-setting acts, etc. I list many of them here--with my comments for some in brackets. I don't necessarily recommend all of them and you should only use those appropriate to your situation and that you will feel comfortable using in practice.

    Return to top of this page

    RESULTS OF BRAINSTORMING IN PREVIOUS SECTIONS OF WORKSHOP

    RULES

    • Be on time
    • Clean up area
    • Mutual respect for learning and right to teach
    • Pick up trash
    • Do in-class work in this class
    • No hats [Hats off?]
    • No staple shooting [do you want to suggest this?]
    • No clay throwing
    • No running
    • No food fights
    • Be cooperative
    • No throwing things [Would this be better? "Throw things on the field, not in the class"
    • Tobacco is prohibited [this is a State/school rule, do you need it?]
    • Listen quietly
    • Keep area clear [specify area]
    • No snapping towels
    • Keep criticism positive
    • Follow directions the first time
    • No talking during roll
    • Eat/drink outside of class
    • Use proper language in class
    • Work to the end of class
    • Dispose of gum before entering
    • Carry microscope with two hands
    • Attend to the work of the class ["no note passing," etc. can be handled in the explanation of what the rule means.]
    • Leave the belongings of others alone
    • Keep hands and feet to yourself
    • Don't make fun of others [Items like the last three can be covered with a rule like "Respect others and their possessions."]
    • Raise your hand to be recognized
    • Be prepared
    • Stay in seat
    • Be an active listener
    • Follow safety rules
    • No complaining about assignments [Students will try to negotiate a postponement, etc. It is usually best to listen, avoid getting into an argument, and restate the assignment, i.e., "broken record."]
    • Take care of equipment
    • Sit correctly in seat [posture]
    • Respect materials
    • Sharpen pencil before the bell rings [what happens if the pencil breaks?]
    • No cheating. ["Do your own work"]
    • Be responsible
    • Bring materials to class
    • Ask to leave the room [Is this what you intend?]
    • Turn assignments in on time
    • No unauthorized experiments
    • Do work in ink in proper format
    • Talk only with permission
    • Be in your seat when the bell rings
    • No talking across the room

    State rules positively when possible, use as few rules as you can and still reach your objectives, let one rule cover a number of related ideas, and explain the rules with examples to your class.

    What (few) rules do you really need to set the environment for learning?

    LIMIT SETTING ACTS

    Non-verbal:

    Eye contact--composed face

    Proximity

    Calming gesture

    Place hand on the pupil's desk or book

    Open student's book and point at work to be started

    Tap on teacher's desk

    Flash lights off and on

    Personal contact [see "touching" in GESA materials for explanation--touching is powerful and potentially dangerous]

    Peer pressure [may assist but not something teacher can direct]

    Model expected behavior

    Point to posted rule

    Circle child who is asleep/off-task while continuing lecture

    The Stare

    Silence [then follow up with gesture when the student looks up]

    Blow a whistle, click a clicker, tinkle a bell, etc.

    Ignore intentionally [note: by the time the teacher realizes that a child is off task, [there has usually been enough time for extinction to work if it is going to work.]

    Start over

    Talk with student after class

    Nod or point with eye contact

    Moving in [it is suggested that you not attempt the Fred Jones sequence unless you have been trained/practiced.]

    Point at student

    Hand gestures, e.g., palm down or out, thumbs down

    Incorporate student who is off-task into the demonstration [not a put down: "Joe, please hold the end of this for me"]

    Raise your hand [cooperative learning signal]

    If a general problem, have class reenter the room

    Verbal acts short of consequences:

    Call student by name

    I need you to....

    Quietly, calmly [one-to-one] state what you want, e.g., "I need you to...."

    Compliment someone who is on task [Lee Canter says to compliment several acts before applying negative consequences]

    Peer counseling [e.g., send a pair out so the rules can be explained before consequences affecting preferred activity time would be imposed

    Broken record [in lieu of arguing about what happened] "I need you to...." "But Louie started it." "I need you to ...."

    Limit setting acts are the preferred thing for the teacher to do to stop misbehavior...only use the negative consequences when limit setting isn't working or when the act is deliberate/persistent

    POSITIVE CONSEQUENCES/PREFERRED ACTIVITY TIME

    Positive consequences, as used here are typically attached to specific, individual behaviors, e.g., when an individual gives a correct response, you praise the answer. Preferred Activity Time [PAT] is given as a result of accumulated positive class behavior over a period of time. Some of the following could be utilized as positive consequences for individual or class acts as well as being on the list of preferred activities to be chosen by the class when "Preferred Activity Time Friday" comes.

    • Movies, videos
    • Music [It is suggested that the teacher list the music from which the class will choose and control the sound level. A heavy beat/vocals tend to interfere with seat work.]
    • Teacher reads aloud
    • Guest speaker/presentation
    • Field trips
    • Computer time
    • "Great Kid" note
    • Positive letter home
    • Contest
    • Free reading
    • Variety box of games in content area, e.g., Trivial Pursuit
    • baseball (the in-class game in which one team's pitcher "pitches" questions to the other team's batter)
    • No homework [if goal has been met in class]
    • awards given at ceremony
    • Positive personal award
    • Games of lower organization
    • Two class competition
    • Class discussion of topic of their choice
    • Pizza or Popcorn [easy on the butter and salt]
    • Raffle tickets for privileges, prizes
    • Work on puzzles [note: this kind of activity can have a curricular value and still be fun]
    • Open microphone
    • Draw a mural
    • Free labs
    • Spelling bee
    • Make posters
    • Career investigation
    • Class party [parties don't work out when every class does it...like on the last day of year]
    • Free writing
    • Sing-a-long with or without instruments
    • Planning a class project
    • Team prize
    • Strokes [verbal, written]


    LEE CANTER'S SUGGESTIONS FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

    POSITIVE CONSEQUENCES

    Recognition

    Happy Gram to Parent/Student

    Recognition in daily bulletin

    Smile

    Pat on back

    Display work

    Standing ovation

    Round of applause

    Encouraging words

    Privileges

    Library pass

    Free time

    Choice of where to sit

    Use of lab equipment

    Allow to do special experiment

    Computer time

    No weekend homework

    Choice of music

    Early to lunch

    Tangible Rewards

    Snacks/soft drinks in room

    Free pass to event

    Video treat

    Bonus points

    Video game tokens

    Extra credit

    Return to the top of this page


    NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES

    In-class detention [note: student must be permitted to eat lunch; if after school, need to notify office, notify parent, and/or arrange for child to be picked up if missing the bus.]

    Send to room 12 [you and another teacher have agreed to park the other's problems...a visiting "non person" may return when assignment is completed.]

    Parent attends class with miscreant by mutual agreement

    Tape recorder "so I can play it when your mother asks what you've been up to."

    Contract [between teacher and pupil]

    Ten laps/essay [do you want to equate school work with punishment?]

    Isolation [be careful about parking child in the hallway...it gets to be great fun when several are there from different classes; your supervision responsibility is in jeopardy; check to see if there is a school rule aboutthis. May be o.k. if, "John, I want you to wait for me outside the door, I'll be there as soon as I get the class started...."]

    Restrict activity

    Name on the board, check marks [lunch-time/after school detention]

    Phone parents

    Send letter home [see sample following this section]

    Give minus points/demerits [this only works if you have a way to earn points/merits]

    Cease activity students want

    Take time away from PAT [not usually advisable unless you typically give liberally as well as take away]

    Lose lab points

    Lose a privilege

    Time out

    Stop the lesson [Lee Canter says you should always stop and deal with interruptions; however, limit-setting acts may be used without interruption of the lesson.]

    Solitary time

    Restrict student to chair

    Extra work [do you wish to equate school work with punishment?]

    Have student apologize to teacher and class [only if student has agreed to do so privately beforehand and if there is reason to believe that the student intends to follow through.]

    Clean room

    Charge a fee [may not be legal; check this out before announcing it.]


    OUT-OF-CLASS BACK-UP SYSTEM

    [Requires help from others to carry out]
    Saturday school clean-up

    Referral to office

    Detention [school-wide plan]

    Student-Parent-Teacher-Administrator/counselor conference [usually terminates with a contract]

    Deliver student to parent

    In-school suspension

    Suspension in office

    Suspend from class [teacher can do this for one day...check school policy on notification...administrator can suspend for longer period.]

    Suspend from school [only administrator can]

    Expulsion [only school board can]

    Note: Police and court actions may be used if indicated by the crime. A school attendance review board [SARB] may be used if appropriate.


    A Sample Letter Home

    PACIFIC HIGH SCHOOL

    FIFTH AND UNION STREETS
    Arcata, CA 95521

    October xx, 199x

    Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith:

    Your son, Bill, talks to the people sitting near him in his U.S. History class so much that it interferes with his learning and with their learning.

    I have talked with him about it, but the problem persists.

    I have attached a copy of the class discipline plan to this letter for your convenience. As you can see, the next step is for me to notify you.

    If Bill continues to disrupt the class, the next step is suspension from this class for one period and referral to the office.

    From our earlier conversation, I know you have high hopes for Bill. I need your help now. Please discuss this with Bill. I am sure that we can bring about a change if we work together. If you have any questions, please call me at 000-0000 between 11:00 am and 12:00 noon, my preparation period, or call me at home between 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. at 111-1111.

    Please sign below and ask Bill to return this to me so that I will know that you received the message.

    Sincerely,

    Eric Q. Teacher

    cc: Bill Smith


    Return to top of this page

    Go back to Class handouts, models, keys, etc.

    Go back to index